This Blog is Part of ChristianAussies.com

Teaching Twos About Homosexuality

I receive regular newsletters from the Australian Prayer Network (ausprayernet.org.au), and was horrified to read this report in a recent mail from them:

A book that teaches children about lesbian mums getting pregnant using sperm donors is being pitched at kids as young as two. The publication, Where Did I Really Come From?, also features a drawing of two gay men holding a baby, in a chapter about surrogacy. The book, which includes descriptions of sexual intercourse, is being promoted as suitable to be read to two-year-old children. But angry family advocates claim the book targets children too young. “It devalues the traditional family unit and at the very least desensitises us,” Focus On The Family spokeswoman Deb Sorensen said.

A chapter on assisted conception, tells children: “Sometimes, a woman really wants to have a baby but she doesn’t want to have intercourse with a man. “Some women want to bring up a baby by themselves, or with another woman, so the baby gets two mums. “A woman may arrange for a doctor to get some sperm for her, or a special man she knows may give her some of his sperm.” The book was first penned in the early 1990s, but has been updated and relaunched by Learn to Include, which has published a range of books featuring child characters whose parents are gay.

Learn to Include’s website says the book’s “simple, non-judgmental explanations of sexual intercourse, assisted conception, pregnancy, birth, adoption and surrogacy are “suitable for 2-12 year olds”. Ms Sorensen said a two-year-old would probably not understand the content. She questioned the message it delivered, particularly in relation to same-sex parents. “Research shows consistently that children are much better off with a mum and a dad,” Ms Sorensen said.

Now let me say very clearly that I do not hate homosexuals, nor am I “homophobic” (a phobia is an irrational fear, and I most certainly do not fear homosexuals.) I do, however, take a Biblical stand on sexuality in general: that the only legitimate place for a sexual relationship is between a man and a woman within the sanctity of marriage. Anything else is outside of God’s purposes, and for a very good reason. God designed men and women to be complementary - both physically and emotionally. He designed the sexual relationship to be a beautiful expression of the love between a man and a woman, which would, in the right circumstances, result in the production of a new human life. He designed families to function best when led by a father and a mother working together. To promote anything else - whether homosexuality, intentional single parenthood, casual sexual encounters or whatever - is to rob people of the best that God planned for them. To indulge in a sexual relationship other than that sanctioned by God is sin. I make absolutely no apologies for that stand.

Apart from the question of homosexuality, however, this report causes an even deeper concern: that of the unnecessary sexualization of our children. Two year olds should not be having sexual messages rammed down their throats, not in any form. Neither should four, six, or eight year olds. As for “assisted conception” and “surrogacy” - it is the height of idiocy to expect a young child to grasp, or even be interested in, such concepts.

The homosexual lobby tries to tell us that 10% of the population is homosexual - a grossly exaggerated figure based on biased and poorly conducted research. Even if it were true, though, that means that 90% of the population is NOT. To attempt to indoctrinate children with the values of a tiny minority of the population by violating the innocence of their childhood is nothing short of child abuse.

This blog is © copyright Lynn Fowler.

There is one God, and one mediator between God and people, the man Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2:51 Timothy 2:5
English: World English Bible - WEB

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,

)in Whom all the fullness of the Godhead dwells in bodily form (Colossians 2:9Colossians 2:9
English: World English Bible - WEB

9 For in him all the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily,
)and Whom God the Father has exalted to the highest place, giving Him the Name which is above every name, that at the Name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:9-11Philippians 2:9-11
English: World English Bible - WEB

9 Therefore God also highly exalted him, and gave to him the name which is above every name; 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, those on earth, and those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
)


Share This Post
Written by revlynn in: Angry | Tags: , , ,
May
17
2009
0

Middle Class Welfare Takes From the Poor

“He who oppresses the poor to increase his wealth and he who gives gifts to the rich - both come to poverty.” Proverbs 22:16Proverbs 22:16
English: World English Bible - WEB

16 Whoever oppresses the poor for his own increase and whoever gives to the rich, Both come to poverty.

(NIV)

The release of the federal budget this week reminded me of this verse. It is a pity Kevin Rudd, who is a born-again Christian, didn’t remember it. In spite of all the pre-budget hype about “cutting middle class welfare”, what we received was a budget that took from the poor and gave to those who, whilst they may not consider themselves rich, are most certainly very comfortable.

With great fanfare it was announced that pensioners will be receiving an extra $32 per week. Sounds great, until you realize the bit that wasn’t mentioned anywhere - those same pensioners will no longer receive the $1000 annual one-off payment that has been part of the budget for several years now. Take that off the overall picture, and the actual increase comes down to just a bit over $12 per week - barely enough to replace a couple of light bulbs with the new-fangled ones we are now forced to use because of minimal savings to overall power usage.

Even worse, those on Widow Allowance, the forgotten people of the welfare spectrum, received ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Widow Allowance was already $116 per fortnight behind the pension, with the increase it will be close to $180 per fortnight behind. What’s more, those on WA have also received the $1000 bonus for the past few years, but now that is gone - so effectively this budget has CUT the Widow Allowance by nearly $20 per week. Mr Rudd and his cronies have already stated that they could not live on the pension, yet they expect people to live on $226.65 per week.

In the lead-up to the budget I spent the best part of a whole day, e-mailing every member of parliament in both houses to bring to their attention the plight of those on Widow Allowance. The buck-passing was something to behold: “You’re not in my electorate” (in spite of the fact that there are undoubtedly many women on WA who are in the electorates of these people) or “It’s not my portfolio” - yeah, right, so you only ever talk about things that effect your own portfolio.

One MP informed me that the Widow Allowance is pegged to the Newstart Allowance (I knew that!) and that those on WA are receiving the same as other “working age Australians.” My response to this is that just because it IS doesn’t mean is it SHOULD BE. The existence of the WA is an admission that women in this age group without recent workforce experience are extremely unlikely to be able to find work. Newstart is designed as short term relief for the unemployed, and by implication assumes that they will only be unemployed for a short term. On the other hand, people with disabilities and their carers (who may be “working age”) are recognized as unlikely to be able to gain full time employment because of their circumstances, and are therefore paid a pension. My argument is that the situation of those on WA is closer to that of disabled and carers than to that of those on Newstart, and therefore WA should be pegged to the pension, not to Newstart.

The same MP also said that payments to women should not reflect the position of their partners or former partners (in other words, just because a woman is divorced or widowed, even though her husband may have not allowed her to work for twenty years before it happened, she should not be treated differently from any other unemployed person.) However, this is a rule that applies only when it suits the government’s convenience. If it were otherwise, every married or partnered welfare recipient would receive the same as a single person, because their payment would not depend on the status of their partner.

So, pensioners emerge from the budget only about $12 per week better off in real terms, and those on Widow Allowance emerge around $20 per week worse off …

Meanwhile, working mums on up to $150,000 per year (that’s nearly $3,000 per week, a figure which most people would agree places one very firmly in the well-to-do bracket) will be able to claim $544 per week for 18 weeks paid maternity allowance. Spread over a year, that breaks down to a bit over $188 per week - just $38 per week less than the TOTAL INCOME of those on WA. What’s more, as far as I can tell there is no provision about how often a woman will be able to claim this - potentially one could go into the full-time baby making business, producing a bub every year, and have a permanent taxpayer-funded income of $188 per week ON TOP OF the income she could earn in the other 34 weeks of the year.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m all for families and I have grandkids myself. But it seems to me that someone on $3000 per week (or even half that) should be able to have the discipline to set aside enough money to be able to support herself for 18 weeks if she wants to take time out to have a bub.

By giving such handouts to those who definitely don’t need them, the government is denying a livable income to those who most desperately do need it. It is nothing short of oppressing the poor in order to give gifts to the rich. God’s word says that leads to poverty … a worrying thought for the direction this nation is heading.

This blog is © copyright Lynn Fowler.

There is one God, and one mediator between God and people, the man Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2:51 Timothy 2:5
English: World English Bible - WEB

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,

)in Whom all the fullness of the Godhead dwells in bodily form (Colossians 2:9Colossians 2:9
English: World English Bible - WEB

9 For in him all the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily,
)and Whom God the Father has exalted to the highest place, giving Him the Name which is above every name, that at the Name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:9-11Philippians 2:9-11
English: World English Bible - WEB

9 Therefore God also highly exalted him, and gave to him the name which is above every name; 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, those on earth, and those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
)


Share This Post

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes